this coment is not regards to ur MALHAR aalekh. i have already expresed.
you comented on ‘shama’ S post ‘ GAJAB kanoon………( and very honestly and not that i believed you , IKNOW THAT U TO BE TRUE. she replied but wanted to prove that she knows………..and this to be her knowledge ( you may disagree , but i have reasons to believe, and her inclinations to prove her , intelectual superioty, expecting just commendations and no disagreement .
what emrges to be her cause is not her own knowledge but my contribution , too . if not important, atleast not disregardable without due regards,particularly , contempt.
I CARRRY NO BIASE OR PREJUDICE , BUT DUE RESPECT FOR TRUTH.I AM NOT HESITATING, TO ACCEPT THE FACT THAT WE HAD A EMOTIONAL RELATIONS,WHICH WENT BITTER .
BUT I NEED NOT WASTE A SINGLE WORD TO PROVE THAT SHE IS NOT ORIGINAL (,AS U SUSPECTED AND EXPRESSED AS SUCH .) WE TOGETHER HAVE 5 PARTS AND ABOUT 2 HOURS OF TAPED CONVERTATIONS ,
ANY ONE IS FREE TO CONCLUDE , AND /OR DISAGREE BUT /AND NOT DISREGARD ANY OPINION . YOU MAY QUOTE ME ON RECORDS , WITH FULL RESPONSIBILITY OF MINE , FOR ANY LIBALITY , AND/BUT TO BE ANY WAY FOR CAUSE OF ANY ACTION LEGAL
PROVIDED OUR TAPED CONVERSATIONS , AS MENTIONED ABOVE MAY BE ADMISABLE TRUTH .
HER POST MAY NOT BE REGARDED ,AS SHE MISUNDERSTOOD BUT FOR FEW FACTS , GO TO HER POST AND READ MY COMMENTS . YOU WILL BE LEFT WITH NOT MANY